Every year, there are a few movies made that take your
breath away. Haider was one of those. I had the privilege of watching Haider in
the 1st week of its release. It was an extremely well made movie
sure to get good numbers in revenues too. A rare combination these days. Hence,
I was taken aback when I started reading about the vehement criticism that
followed soon after. In hindsight, I should have guessed it. Anything related
to religion touches our nerve, doesn't it?
I would like to describe what I saw in the movie. I saw a
doctor trying to assist some terrorists. I saw the army take him away and make
him “disappear”. I saw a pained boy, biased by his love for his father, fight
all the elements of the society, first for his safe release and then to avenge
him. I saw a mother, torn apart between the love for her son and her latent
feelings for her husband’s brother, trying to make a ruined family work. It was
a beautiful story regarding the conflicting human emotions. Oh, and it was a Muslim
family and the story was set in Kashmir.
The last point had our pseudo patriots pointing their
daggers towards the director of the movie. How could he show the army in bad
light? How could his movies be sympathetic towards Muslims? Does he not
recognize that he is trying to show Indian Army in bad light? How can he be
allowed to do this?
The point which everyone conveniently ignores is the fact
that Indian army is not even shown in bad light. The father was a supporting
the terrorists. He is clearly the bad guy in the movie. The Indian army does
the right thing by taking him away. As viewers, we know what he did was wrong.
And he got punished for his actions. As the CIA revelations have shown, when it
is a matter of terrorism which is a national security threat, sometimes even
the innocent suffer the darkest of fate. And in our movie, it is clearly shown
that the father is wrong. And so, I repeat, Indian army was right to take him
away. Where then is the problem?
The problem is that the movie is shown through the eyes of his
son. He simply cannot accept the fact that his father has been involved in
terrorist activities. Again, a very realistic assumption. We all worship our
dad’s, don’t we? And so, in his view, what happened was not correct. And so he
goes about killing everyone who he thinks is responsible for the death. And
mind you, even then the movie does not show that he has any agenda against the
army. The hatred is directed towards his uncle, and no-one else.
Many a Haider have been born whose fathers have been
innocent too. I personally would not mind a movie made on that theme too.
I hear that the critics question that why has Vishal Bhardwaj not
shown the other side of the story too. The story of our great Indian army. But
we already got those in the form of Border et al. In any case, as a creative
movie maker, it is not his responsibility that he shows you the full spectrum
of Kashmir. He showed you the one side that no movie beforehand had shown.
Not that I cared about any of it. For me, as I said before,
the movie was about the complex interplay of emotions
And obviously, the breathtaking beauty of Kashmir.
No comments:
Post a Comment